Abstract
Consolidants are used widely in stone sculptures, statues and building units to improve the cohesion between the grains, increase mechanical strength and thereby improve the material durability. Although they are widely used in conservation projects, their performance in brick masonry, especially under salt weathering conditions, demands further research. This study aims to study the behaviour of brick-lime mortar masonry systems under accelerated salt weathering after consolidation with tetraethoxysilane (TEOS). Mass loss monitoring, mineralogical characterisation and microstructural analysis were performed to evaluate the alterations in the substrates, which are influenced by the salt type, crystallisation mechanism, consolidant composition and substrate mineralogy. The weathered brick-mortar sandwiches were sheared to understand the role played by consolidants on the mechanical performance of the composite system. The results indicate that TEOS strengthened the bricks and mortars both individually and as composites, with a risk of altering the pore structure.
References
[1] A. Menon, “Heritage Conservation in India: Challenges and New Paradigms,” SAHC2014 – 9th Int. Conf. Struct. Anal. Hist. Constr., no. October, pp. 14–17, 2014.
[2] V. A. Anupama and M. Santhanam, “Salt weathering resilience in masonry: An accelerated laboratory study involving wind-induced variations,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 449, p. 138360, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.138360.
[3] R. J. Flatt, “Salt damage in porous materials : how high supersaturations are generated,” J. Cryst. Growth, vol. 242, pp. 435–454, 2002.
[4] J. He et al., “Ethyl silicate–nanolime treatment for the consolidation of calcareous building materials,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 418, no. November 2023, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.135437.
[5] G. Masi, A. Dal Pozzo, G. Ugolotti, A. Tugnoli, and E. Sassoni, “Choosing the consolidant for carbonate substrates: Technical performance and environmental sustainability of selected inorganic and organic products,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 407, no. May, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.133599.
[6] E. Sassoni, E. Franzoni, B. Pigino, G. W. Scherer, and S. Naidu, “Consolidation of calcareous and siliceous sandstones by hydroxyapatite: Comparison with a TEOS-based consolidant,” J. Cult. Herit., vol. 14, no. 3 SUPPL, pp. e103–e108, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.culher.2012.11.029.
[7] V. A. Anupama, E. Sassoni, and M. Santhanam, “Consolidants in Salt-Weathered Masonry: Retention and Efficiency of DAP and TEOS,” RILEM Tech. Lett., vol. 9, pp. 76–86, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.21809/rilemtechlett.2024.206.
[8] E. Sassoni, G. Graziani, and E. Franzoni, “An innovative phosphate-based consolidant for limestone. Part 2: Durability in comparison with ethyl silicate,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 102, pp. 931–942, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.10.202.
[9] G. W. Scherer and G. S. Wheeler, “Silicate consolidants for stone,” Key Eng. Mater., vol. 391, pp. 1–25, 2009, doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.391.1.
[10] Barbara. Lubelli et al., “Recommendation of RILEM TC 271-ASC: New accelerated test procedure for the assessment of resistance of natural stone and fired-clay brick units against salt crystallization,” Mater. Struct. Constr., vol. 56, no. 5, 2023, doi: 10.1617/s11527-023-02158-0.
[11] E. Franzoni, G. Graziani, and E. Sassoni, “TEOS-based treatments for stone consolidation: acceleration of hydrolysis–condensation reactions by poulticing,” J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol., vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 398–405, 2015, doi: 10.1007/s10971-014-3610-3.
[12] B. Lubelli, R. P. J. van Hees, and T. G. Nijland, “Salt crystallization damage: how realistic are existing ageing tests?,” Proc. Int. Conf. Ageing Mater. Struct., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 103–111, 2014.
[13] G. M. C. Gemelli, R. Zarzuela, F. Fernandez, and M. J. Mosquera, “Compatibility, effectiveness and susceptibility to degradation of alkoxysilane-based consolidation treatments on a carbonate stone,” J. Build. Eng., vol. 42, no. June, p. 102840, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102840.
[14] B. Sena da Fonseca, A. P. Ferreira Pinto, M. Rucha, M. M. Alves, and M. F. Montemor, “Damaging effects of salt crystallizationn a porous limestone after consolidation treatments,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 374, no. March, p. 130967, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.130967.
[15] A. Murru and R. Fort, “Diammonium hydrogen phosphate (DAP) as a consolidant in carbonate stones: Impact of application methods on effectiveness,” J. Cult. Herit., vol. 42, pp. 45–55, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.culher.2019.09.003.
[16] G. Graziani, E. Sassoni, and E. Franzoni, “Consolidation of porous carbonate stones by an innovative phosphate treatment: Mechanical strengthening and physical-microstructural compatibility in comparison with TEOS-based treatments,” Herit. Sci., vol. 3, no. 1, 2015, doi: 10.1186/s40494-014-0031-0.
[17] G. Masi and E. Sassoni, “Air lime mortar consolidation by nanolimes and ammonium phosphate: Compatibility, effectiveness and durability,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 299, p. 123999, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123999.